(DOWNLOAD) "Northerly Corp. v. Hermett Realty Corporation Et Al." by Supreme Court of New York * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Northerly Corp. v. Hermett Realty Corporation Et Al.
- Author : Supreme Court of New York
- Release Date : January 08, 1962
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 68 KB
Description
Order, entered June 20, 1961, granting plaintiff's motion to strike out the second and fourth defenses in defendants-appellants' answer as insufficient pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and to dismiss the counterclaim pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 110 of the Rules of Civil Practice unanimously modified to the extent of reinstating the fourth defense, and, as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendants-appellants. In this action for ejectment, plaintiff landlord claims that defendants violated the covenant, in a 21-year lease, against subletting without the written consent of the landlord. The second defense alleges that the landlord has permanently waived and nullified the covenant by the acceptance of rent knowing of subletting without the written consent of the landlord. In the fourth defense, defendants allege that plaintiff is estopped from contending that defendants may not sublet without written consent of the landlord because (1) of representations made that the covenant would not be enforced, (2) of encouragement by the landlord's predecessor to spend large sums of money to convert the building into a multiple dwelling in order to sublet parts of it, and (3) of the acceptance of rent for over 30 years with full knowledge that parts of the building were being sublet without the landlord's prior written consent. The counterclaim seeks reformation of the lease so as to conform it to the intention of the parties not to require the tenant to obtain the prior written consent of the landlord in order to sublet the apartments and store. The second defense of waiver is insufficient in law. Even if there had been a waiver of the breach of the covenant against subletting, the landlord's consent to prior sublettings does not constitute a waiver as to future breaches. The action is based upon breaches occurring after notice by the landlord that it would insist upon full performance of all covenants, including the provision against subletting without the written consent of the landlord. However, the facts upon which defendants rely to support a waiver, are together
 "Northerly Corp. v. Hermett Realty Corporation Et Al." by Supreme Court of New York * eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free){kind=link}